this

FAQ
search
contact
rss/xml
atom/xml
spam notice
terms of use
warrant canary


sundries

xkcd
Fripp
Rahul
skippy
Sroyon
pylduck
Dogblog
thistothat
Joe.My.God.
Woolly Days
Futility Closet
Language Log
Bruce Schneier
Dinosaur Comics


archive


Sceloporus occidentalis
Tuesday evening.  Mount Whitney roughly in the center.hand
Jupiter
and
Venus.
Harry
Climbing partner.
From Chief Justice Roberts' dissent to today's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges (emphasis mine):
The fundamental right to marry does not include a right to make a State change its definition of marriage. And a State‚Äôs decision to maintain the meaning of marriage that has persisted in every culture throughout human history can hardly be called irrational.
and from Justice Scalia's dissent:
[Justices in the majority] are willing to say that any citizen who does not agree with that, who adheres to what was, until 15 years ago, the unanimous judgment of all generations and all societies, stands against the Constitution.
Numerous societies living on North American soil before there was a USA evidently don't count.
In 1542, one of the earliest Spanish explorers in Florida, Cabeza de Vaca, reported on his previous five years among the Timucua Indians: "During the time I was thus among these people I saw a devilish thing, and it is that I saw one man married to another."
The Spirit and the Flesh: Sexual Diversity in American Indian Culture, p. 110
Lawyers arguing on behalf of Obergefell et al. share in the blame for this omission. At oral argument, Scalia asked petitioners if they knew of any society that permitted same‑sex marriage prior to the Netherlands in 2001 and they couldn't name any. next time this happens I'll try for a shallower depth of field
Excitement on my block this morning.
Yesterday, Wikileaks started posting a bunch of secret Saudi communications. Al Jazeera America reports:
Saudi officials have not explicitly challenged the authenticity of the documents, and Saudi diplomats have not answered repeated requests for comment. However, the Foreign Ministry posted a carefully worded message on its Twitter account early Saturday morning, warning citizens to avoid visiting "any website with the aim of getting a document or leaked information that could be untrue and aims to harm the nation."
In 2010, when Wikileaks published cables leaked by then‑Bradley Manning, the US government couldn't tell the general public not to read them—but the over 5 million Americans who hold security clearances are subject to different rules. The government continued to deem the embassy cables classified despite their widespread publication and sent a memo to companies with cleared employees reminding them of the oath they took not to access materials for which they weren't granted permission. In other words, the government told millions of its citizens to avert their eyes should they come across certain materials in a newspaper.

Such requests are of course subject to the Streisand effect. Caesalpinia gilliesii
The Wall Street Journal, June 9, 2015 Does your dog
own or rent?
NY Times headline, June 16, 2015 stripper linked to a governor
Yes, I am easily amused.
Headline from today's New York Times.
Stripper image from a 1959 AP photo of Ms. Starr.
Centrifugal governor illustration licensed under Public Domain via Wikimedia Commons.
Cylindropuntia sp. A cactus I planted in my yard last year
appears to be preparing its first flowers.