Sunday 29 Jan 2017 comment?
I don't have much experience pruning plants for the purpose of shaping them.
I tend to let them grow as they will,
in the spirit of honoring stochasticity.
I have a 20+ year old plant that grows largely downward.
For about the past ten years I've had its pot on
a shelf near the ceiling of my living room.
The slim thorny branches looked better before they got long enough to
reach the floor. The problem wasn't just the form but also that the
plant seems overextended.
Stems once lush with leaves are now rather spare. I'd rather
have a plant that at least looks like it's thriving—so what to do?
Putting it in a larger pot seemed untenable. Starting over (this species
is easily cultivated from cuttings) is not my first choice.
I decided on pruning much of it away. A friend
(who does have a fair amount of experience with plants) told me
to prune it in stages. "No," I said, "I'm going to
prune the daylights out of it."
Today was pruning day. Now comes waiting to see whether fewer,
shorter branches in fact leaf out better.
Monday 23 Jan 2017 1 comment

bunny
mammal tracks in the snow.
Friday 20 Jan 2017 3 comments

jackrabbit, this afternoon.
Thursday 19 Jan 2017 1 comment
Around 30 years ago, a friend got a gig interpreting for a Japanese
writer who'd come to the USA to interview William S. Burroughs.
My friend told Burroughs he'd always liked the author's
idiosyncratic use of the phrase "subject to", e.g.
(from
Junky):
Junkies run on junk time and junk metabolism.
They are subject to junk climate.
They are warmed and chilled by junk.
Burroughs gave my friend a photo signed
with a note that he worked "subject to" into.
Seeing this sign today reminded me of Burroughs:

It makes me wish it were a trend, with "subject to"
appearing in signs where it's normally implicit, e.g.:
Friday 06 Jan 2017 4 comments
Something
went wrong with my left eye starting on December 31.
Flashes of light around the edges of the visual field,
and a barrage of new floaters the next day. The web told me these
are symptoms of posterior vitreous detachment, in most cases no big deal
but get it examined right away to make sure the retina isn't torn as well.
Right away in this case came on January 3,
the first day I could find an eye doctor's office open.
How cool of my eye to pick Saturday of a holiday weekend to disintegrate.
Eye doctors have the best equipment. Their waiting rooms are always full,
because who wouldn't want to rest their head on a fine Swiss microscope.
If only all age-related deterioration were this benign.
My eye is OK, no treatment is needed.
I've got more floaters but they're more entertaining than annoying.
They come and go and usually aren't obtrusive.
I'd show you, but my visual cortex doesn't have a print screen button.
It's like a snow dome except with
cooler shapes that aren't as numerous nor as opaque.