Wednesday 31 Aug 2016 1 comment
Saturday 20 Aug 2016 comment? It's not uncommon for computer manufacturers to sell the same hardware at multiple price points, with the lower‑priced models artificially slowed down. This isn't new, nor is it a deep dark secret, but it struck me as a bit weird when I first heard about the practice. (I was young and naïve to the ways of the business world). I get the impression Amazon sometimes delays shipment according to the price paid. They use an economical next‑day carrier for shipments within California, but the customer doesn't enjoy that speed if they didn't pay for it. An order I placed this month with the cheapest (i.e., free) shipping option was shipped via a next‑day service—but only after Amazon sat on the order for five (calendar) days. Friday 19 Aug 2016 1 comment ![]() If you ever wondered how to glean the same information from a no‑moving‑parts meter like the one shown: the dots under the rightmost numeral are a "watt disk emulator". A dot turns dark or light with each watt‑hour used. (The "kWh" legend next to the dots refers to the numeric reading, not the dots.) The dots march left‑to‑right if you're consuming energy, right‑to‑left if you're sending energy into the grid. Happy nineteenth, everyone. Monday 15 Aug 2016 1 comment ![]()
Black played e1N+, i.e. he promoted the pawn to a knight (giving check)
and the game ended in a draw.
Positions that call for underpromotion are rare but not unheard of; the Wikipedia article on pawn promotion mentions a game from 2006 that reached a position like this one. Most chess players find aesthetic value in underpromotion (when it's not a gratuitious flourish), and why not? Seeing a knight do what a queen couldn't is like watching an underdog win. Here's my question though. If underpromotion—which is a form of understatement—is so endearing, and if the taste of chess players isn't way out of the mainstream (a big if?), why isn't understatement in general more popular, say in movies (where overstatement is routine)? Saturday 13 Aug 2016 comment? For about a week now I've seen the same lizard in the same spot day after day. He clings to the side of my house just below the eaves, about ten feet off the ground. I don't know what he thinks about but I permit myself to admire his example of composure and equanimity. He looks at me when I walk by. He goes somewhere else in the nighttime and returns in the morning, except for Thursday when I didn't see him at all. The Moon was close to Mars and Saturn in the sky that day and perhaps he decided to keep a low profile until the baleful influence of that conjunction had subsided. Ernest Barnes, Bishop of Birmingham, wondered how a creature as excellent as man could fail to be immortal. "His mind is a far finer instrument than anything that had appeared earlier—he knows right and wrong. He can build Westminster Abbey. He can make an airplane." Yeah, but can he do this— ![]() Tuesday 09 Aug 2016 comment? I'm not sure which of these events surprised me the most:
Saturday 06 Aug 2016 comment?
Amazon Prime Air is registering freight airplanes with prime numbers. Their first Amazon-branded plane (a Boeing 767) has tail number N1997A. Now that they've gotten a mundane choice out of the way (Amazon went public in 1997), I'll be curious to see what other primes they pick. If the prime number theme was intended to be endearing to geeks (and it is), the "Amazon One" text painted near the cockpit windows fails. One is not prime. Nor is it zero, the geek's choice of where to start numbering things. And this isn't Amazon's first plane, it's just the first they painted their name on. The president of the leasing company (which provided ten planes to Amazon before this one) jokingly said, "This is Amazon 11, as far as we’re concerned." |
current journal
FAQ search contact rss/xml atom/xml spam notice terms of use warrant canary archive
|